|
The Federalist No. 12
The Utility of the Union In Respect to Revenue
New York Packet
Tuesday, November 27, 1787
[Alexander
Hamilton]
To the People of the State of New York:
THE
effects of Union upon the commercial prosperity of the States have been
sufficiently delineated. Its tendency to promote the interests of revenue will
be the subject of our present inquiry.
The prosperity of commerce is now perceived and
acknowledged by all enlightened statesmen to be the most useful as well as the
most productive source of national wealth, and has accordingly become a primary
object of their political cares. By multipying the means of gratification, by
promoting the introduction and circulation of the precious metals, those darling
objects of human avarice and enterprise, it serves to vivify and invigorate the
channels of industry, and to make them flow with greater activity and
copiousness. The assiduous merchant, the laborious husbandman, the active
mechanic, and the industrious manufacturer, -- all orders of men, look forward
with eager expectation and growing alacrity to this pleasing reward of their
toils. The often-agitated question between agriculture and commerce has, from
indubitable experience, received a decision which has silenced the rivalship
that once subsisted between them, and has proved, to the satisfaction of their
friends, that their interests are intimately blended and interwoven. It has been
found in various countries that, in proportion as commerce has flourished, land
has risen in value. And how could it have happened otherwise? Could that which
procures a freer vent for the products of the earth, which furnishes new
incitements to the cultivation of land, which is the most powerful instrument in
increasing the quantity of money in a state -- could that, in fine, which is the
faithful handmaid of labor and industry, in every shape, fail to augment that
article, which is the prolific parent of far the greatest part of the objects
upon which they are exerted? It is astonishing that so simple a truth should
ever have had an adversary; and it is one, among a multitude of proofs, how apt
a spirit of ill-informed jealousy, or of too great abstraction and refinement,
is to lead men astray from the plainest truths of reason and conviction.
The ability of a country to pay taxes must always be
proportioned, in a great degree, to the quantity of money in circulation, and to
the celerity with which it circulates. Commerce, contributing to both these
objects, must of necessity render the payment of taxes easier, and facilitate
the requisite supplies to the treasury. The hereditary dominions of the Emperor
of Germany contain a great extent of fertile, cultivated, and populous
territory, a large proportion of which is situated in mild and luxuriant
climates. In some parts of this territory are to be found the best gold and
silver mines in Europe. And yet, from the want of the fostering influence of
commerce, that monarch can boast but slender revenues. He has several times been
compelled to owe obligations to the pecuniary succors of other nations for the
preservation of his essential interests, and is unable, upon the strength of his
own resources, to sustain a long or continued war.
But it is not in this aspect of the subject alone that
Union will be seen to conduce to the purpose of revenue. There are other points
of view, in which its influence will appear more immediate and decisive. It is
evident from the state of the country, from the habits of the people, from the
experience we have had on the point itself, that it is impracticable to raise
any very considerable sums by direct taxation. Tax laws have in vain been
multiplied; new methods to enforce the collection have in vain been tried; the
public expectation has been uniformly disappointed, and the treasuries of the
States have remained empty. The popular system of administration inherent in the
nature of popular government, coinciding with the real scarcity of money
incident to a languid and mutilated state of trade, has hitherto defeated every
experiment for extensive collections, and has at length taught the different
legislatures the folly of attempting them.
No person acquainted with what happens in other countries
will be surprised at this circumstance. In so opulent a nation as that of
Britain, where direct taxes from superior wealth must be much more tolerable,
and, from the vigor of the government, much more practicable, than in America,
far the greatest part of the national revenue is derived from taxes of the
indirect kind, from imposts, and from excises. Duties on imported articles form
a large branch of this latter description.
In America, it is evident that we must a long time depend
for the means of revenue chiefly on such duties. In most parts of it, excises
must be confined within a narrow compass. The genius of the people will ill
brook the inquisitive and peremptory spirit of excise laws. The pockets of the
farmers, on the other hand, will reluctantly yield but scanty supplies, in the
unwelcome shape of impositions on their houses and lands; and personal property
is too precarious and invisible a fund to be laid hold of in any other way than
by the inperceptible agency of taxes on consumption.
If these remarks have any foundation, that state of things
which will best enable us to improve and extend so valuable a resource must be
best adapted to our political welfare. And it cannot admit of a serious doubt,
that this state of things must rest on the basis of a general Union. As far as
this would be conducive to the interests of commerce, so far it must tend to the
extension of the revenue to be drawn from that source. As far as it would
contribute to rendering regulations for the collection of the duties more simple
and efficacious, so far it must serve to answer the purposes of making the same
rate of duties more productive, and of putting it into the power of the
government to increase the rate without prejudice to trade.
The relative situation of these States; the number of
rivers with which they are intersected, and of bays that wash there shores; the
facility of communication in every direction; the affinity of language and
manners; the familiar habits of intercourse; -- all these are circumstances that
would conspire to render an illicit trade between them a matter of little
difficulty, and would insure frequent evasions of the commercial regulations of
each other. The separate States or confederacies would be necessitated by mutual
jealousy to avoid the temptations to that kind of trade by the lowness of their
duties. The temper of our governments, for a long time to come, would not permit
those rigorous precautions by which the European nations guard the avenues into
their respective countries, as well by land as by water; and which, even there,
are found insufficient obstacles to the adventurous stratagems of avarice.
In France, there is an army of patrols (as they are
called) constantly employed to secure their fiscal regulations against the
inroads of the dealers in contraband trade. Mr. Neckar computes the number of
these patrols at upwards of twenty thousand. This shows the immense difficulty
in preventing that species of traffic, where there is an inland communication,
and places in a strong light the disadvantages with which the collection of
duties in this country would be encumbered, if by disunion the States should be
placed in a situation, with respect to each other, resembling that of France
with respect to her neighbors. The arbitrary and vexatious powers with which the
patrols are necessarily armed, would be intolerable in a free country.
If, on the contrary, there be but one government
pervading all the States, there will be, as to the principal part of our
commerce, but ONE SIDE to guard -- the ATLANTIC
COAST. Vessels arriving directly from foreign countries, laden with
valuable cargoes, would rarely choose to hazard themselves to the complicated
and critical perils which would attend attempts to unlade prior to their coming
into port. They would have to dread both the dangers of the coast, and of
detection, as well after as before their arrival at the places of their final
destination. An ordinary degree of vigilance would be competent to the
prevention of any material infractions upon the rights of the revenue. A few
armed vessels, judiciously stationed at the entrances of our ports, might at a
small expense be made useful sentinels of the laws. And the government having
the same interest to provide against violations everywhere, the co-operation of
its measures in each State would have a powerful tendency to render them
effectual. Here also we should preserve by Union, an advantage which nature
holds out to us, and which would be relinquished by separation. The United
States lie at a great distance from Europe, and at a considerable distance from
all other places with which they would have extensive connections of foreign
trade. The passage from them to us, in a few hours, or in a single night, as
between the coasts of France and Britain, and of other neighboring nations,
would be impracticable. This is a prodigious security against a direct
contraband with foreign countries; but a circuitous contraband to one State,
through the medium of another, would be both easy and safe. The difference
between a direct importation from abroad, and an indirect importation through
the channel of a neighboring State, in small parcels, according to time and
opportunity, with the additional facilities of inland communication, must be
palpable to every man of discernment.
It is therefore evident, that one national government
would be able, at much less expense, to extend the duties on imports, beyond
comparison, further than would be practicable to the States separately, or to
any partial confederacies. Hitherto, I believe, it may safely be asserted, that
these duties have not upon an average exceeded in any State three per cent. In
France they are estimated to be about fifteen per cent., and in Britain they
exceed this proportion.1
There seems to be nothing to hinder their being increased in this country to at
least treble their present amount. The single article of ardent spirits, under
federal regulation, might be made to furnish a considerable revenue. Upon a
ratio to the importation into this State, the whole quantity imported into the
United States may be estimated at four millions of gallons; which, at a shilling
per gallon, would produce two hundred thousand pounds. That article would well
bear this rate of duty; and if it should tend to diminish the consumption of it,
such an effect would be equally favorable to the agriculture, to the economy, to
the morals, and to the health of the society. There is, perhaps, nothing so much
a subject of national extravagance as these spirits.
What will be the consequence, if we are not able to avail
ourselves of the resource in question in its full extent? A nation cannot long
exist without revenues. Destitute of this essential support, it must resign its
independence, and sink into the degraded condition of a province. This is an
extremity to which no government will of choice accede. Revenue, therefore, must
be had at all events. In this country, if the principal part be not drawn from
commerce, it must fall with oppressive weight upon land. It has been already
intimated that excises, in their true signification, are too little in unison
with the feelings of the people, to admit of great use being made of that mode
of taxation; nor, indeed, in the States where almost the sole employment is
agriculture, are the objects proper for excise sufficiently numerous to permit
very ample collections in that way. Personal estate (as has been before
remarked), from the difficulty in tracing it, cannot be subjected to large
contributions, by any other means than by taxes on consumption. In populous
cities, it may be enough the subject of conjecture, to occasion the oppression
of individuals, without much aggregate benefit to the State; but beyond these
circles, it must, in a great measure, escape the eye and the hand of the
tax-gatherer. As the necessities of the State, nevertheless, must be satisfied
in some mode or other, the defect of other resources must throw the principal
weight of public burdens on the possessors of land. And as, on the other hand,
the wants of the government can never obtain an adequate supply, unless all the
sources of revenue are open to its demands, the finances of the community, under
such embarrassments, cannot be put into a situation consistent with its
respectability or its security. Thus we shall not even have the consolations of
a full treasury, to atone for the oppression of that valuable class of the
citizens who are employed in the cultivation of the soil. But public and private
distress will keep pace with each other in gloomy concert; and unite in
deploring the infatuation of those counsels which led to disunion.
PUBLIUS
1. If my memory be right they amount to
twenty per cent.
|